You are here
What nanoparticles do to our cells
Silicon dioxide (or E551) in powdered food to stop it clumping; calcium phosphate (or E341) in toothpaste; titanium dioxide that makes white paints shiny; antibacterial and antifungal silver nanoparticles in textiles; gold nanoparticles that enable the targeted destruction of cancer cells… since the end of the 1990s, manufactured nanoparticles (as opposed to those emitted by volcanoes or due to traffic pollution) have spread throughout our everyday environment. Produced from metals (titanium, silver, etc.) but also from carbon, polymers or organic molecules (lipids, peptides, etc.), these substances by definition have dimensions comprised between 1 and 100 nanometres,1 which is more than 10,000 times smaller than a grain of table salt.
This minuscule size means that their surface (where they interact with their environment) is greater relative to their volume, endowing them with novel characteristics in terms of resistivity, electrical conductivity, solubility, chemical reactivity and antibacterial or anti-agglomerant properties; hence their unfailing success and the interest of industry. On the other hand, the size of these substances raises serious concerns regarding their potential effects on health.
Suspected disorders and diseases
“Because of their small size, nanoparticles can cross different physiological barriers – such as that which separates the brain from the bloodstream (blood-brain barrier), the skin or the placenta that protects a foetus – and thus spread throughout the body,” explains Aurélie Niaudet, chemical engineer in the Risk Assessment Department at the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES), which in 2020 published a report on nanomaterials in foods.2 What do we know today about these potential health risks? “Several studies in animals have indicated that some nanoparticles can accumulate in different organs and have a variety of effects, like growth retardation, developmental abnormalities, allergies, cancers, or be deleterious to the nervous system,” the scientist points out. For example, regarding titanium dioxide (additive E171), which gives a white colour to pastries and confectionery, a study in rats3 published in 2017 by a team of researchers from France and Luxembourg showed that chronic oral exposure to this substance induced precancerous lesions in the colons of 40% of the animals exposed. This led to it being banned in France in 2020, and throughout Europe as of January 2022.
Other studies have revealed some of the processes by which these particles and their derivatives interact with our cells. Work4 published in 2021 by a European team – including scientists from the CNRS – showed that metallic nanoparticles act via an “insidious” mechanism: they transform catechol molecules, normally responsible for protecting DNA from oxidation (an adverse reaction)… into semiquinone and quinone molecules which are in fact most harmful to DNA! The problem is that “although research on the impacts of nanoparticles has developed considerably in recent years, there is still very little epidemiological data on their health effects in humans,” the researcher emphasises. Furthermore, information is lacking regarding the fate of these substances in the body; in this regard, the committee for prevention and precaution (a body whose members are appointed by the French Ministry for ecological transition) indicated in a report5 published in 2020 that it was necessary “to characterise and monitor the transformation of nanomaterials in biological matrices”.
A wide-ranging analysis of metallic nanoparticles
As it happens, the team led by Florence Gazeau, a physicist, at the MSC laboratory6 is focusing on this field of research. “In order to understand the potential damage caused by metallic nanoparticles to living cells, we need first of all to clarify their fate in these cells,” she points out. During studies7 published in 2019 – in which Alice Balfourier, now a researcher in the LBM,8 participated in the context of her PhD thesis – the scientists obtained a surprising result. For six months, they monitored the biotransformation of gold nanoparticles captured by fibroblasts (connective tissue cells). They achieved this by combining transmission electron microscopy imaging (a microscopy technique whose resolution can reach 0.08 nanometre) and study of the expression of more than 18,000 genes over time.
While it had generally been accepted until then that gold nanoparticles remained intact indefinitely in the lysosome (a structure that acts as a “waste dump” in a cell), it was found that within a few weeks, these substances underwent degradation and then the recrystallisation of gold into nanoleaves. This phenomenon had previously been observed with gold ions. Most importantly, this suggests that the impact of gold nanoparticles on cells depends more on the type metal they are made of than their nanoparticulate nature.
Work published in September this year9 extended this initial study: “We wanted to know whether our surprising discovery concerning gold – i.e. that cells respond similarly to this metal whether it is in the form of ions or nanoparticles – might also be true of other metals,” explains Florence Gazeau.
This time, the scientists studied the molecular response of human cells to nanoparticles of eight different metals: gold, cadmium, copper, iron, platinum, silver, titanium and zinc. “Our aim was to compare the response of human cells to these different elements in terms of gene expression, and hence the production of proteins. We wanted to see if this cellular response was similar or whether it varied depending on the type of metal and its formulation,” she explains.
The team performed a meta-analysis of 56 studies. These concerned the level of expression of several thousand genes (a total of 14,912) in different cell types (skin, liver, muscle, etc.) exposed to metallic ions or particles for 1 to 24 hours.
A conclusion applicable to all the metals studied
It became clear that for all the metals listed above, the genes overexpressed after exposure were virtually the same whether the cells had been exposed to ions or to nanoparticles derived from these metals. “This result means our 2019 findings regarding gold apply to all the metals studied: in other words, cells are more sensitive to the metal ions released by nanoparticles than to the intrinsic structural properties of these nanoparticles, such as their size or shape,” says Alice Balfourier.
And that is not all! The team also noted that with five of the eight metals examined (cadmium, copper, gold, silver and zinc), the nanoparticles triggered similar biochemical reactions at the cell level. Indeed, “with nanoparticles based on these five metals, we observed an overexpression of the same group of genes, coding for metallothionein proteins. These play a crucial role in regulating cell contents in essential metals (copper, zinc, etc.) and in detoxifying cells of non-essential metals (silver, cadmium, gold, etc.)”, details the biochemist.
Taken together, these findings indicate that firstly, the effect of metallic nanoparticles at the cellular level could be predicted from the impact of their constitutive ions, which is often better elucidated, and secondly that the metals making up the nanoparticles can activate identical genes. This may facilitate the investigation of nanoparticle toxicity in the future.
- 1. 1 nm = 10-9 metre = 0.000000001 metre.
- 2. In French: https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/ERCA2016SA0226Ra.pdf
- 3. “Food-grade TiO2 impairs intestinal and systemic immune homeostasis, initiates preneoplastic lesions and promotes aberrant crypt development in the rat colon”, Sarah Bettini et al., Scientific Report, January 2017. DOI: 10.1038/srep40373.
- 4. “Copper-assisted oxidation of catechols into quinone derivatives”, A.-C. Gómez-Herrero et al., Chemical Science, December 2020. DOI: 10.1039/D0SC04883F.
- 5. Report: “Nanotechnologie – Nanoparticules: Quels dangers, quels risques ?”. Available here (in French): https://bit.ly/3VpaycQ.
- 6. Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes (CNRS / Université Paris Cité).
- 7. “Unexpected intracellular biodegradation and recrystallization of gold nanoparticles” Alice Balfourier et al., PNAS, 7 January 2020. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911734116. Epub 18 Dec. 2019.
- 8. Laboratoire des Biomolécules (CNRS / ENS / Sorbonne Université).
- 9. “Importance of Metal Biotransformation in Cell Response to Metallic Nanoparticles: A Transcriptomic Meta-analysis Study”, Alice Balfourier, Anne-Pia Marty and Florence Gazeau, ACS Nanosci, 30 September 2022. doi.org/10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.2c00035.
Share this article
A freelance science journalist for ten years, Kheira Bettayeb specializes in the fields of medicine, biology, neuroscience, zoology, astronomy, physics and technology. She writes primarily for prominent national (France) magazines.
Log in, join the CNRS News community